Nasdaq-100 ETF decision tool

QQQ vs QQQM: Fees, Prices and Long-Term Cost

Compare QQQ and QQQM prices, 0.18% and 0.15% fees, and long-term costs.

The key difference between QQQ and QQQM

Both track the Nasdaq-100, but QQQM has the lower annual expense ratio.

QQQ has an official total expense ratio of 0.18%, while QQQM charges 0.15%. Long-term holders can start with the fee difference. Frequent traders and options users should also compare QQQ’s trading volume, spreads, and execution costs.

The same benchmark does not make every ownership cost identical. Expense ratios, liquidity, inception dates, and share prices answer different questions.

Benchmark, total expense ratio, and inception data come from official Invesco materials.

QQQ and QQQM prices

QQQ

Invesco QQQ ETF

$704.72

Daily change: +0.03%
Previous close: $704.54

QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

$290.20

Daily change: +0.04%
Previous close: $290.09

Sep 17, 2026, 2:49 AM is the timestamp of this five-minute cached quote snapshot.

Official fund facts

Item	QQQ	QQQM
Benchmark	Nasdaq-100	Nasdaq-100
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.15%
Inception date	Mar 10, 1999	Oct 13, 2020
Facts as of	Mar 31, 2026	Jun 30, 2026

Long-term cost difference calculator

Use the same principal and gross return while applying QQQ’s 0.18% and QQQM’s 0.15% expense ratios.

Starting amountYearsGross annual return

QQQ after fees: $37,415
QQQM after fees: $37,626
Estimated QQQM advantage: $211

This estimate assumes unchanged expense ratios and reinvestment at the same return. It excludes taxes, commissions, bid-ask spreads, and tracking differences.

QQQ

Select QQQ or QQQM to use line or candlestick views and technical indicators.

불스토리는 TradingView의 차트 기술을 통해 실시간 가격을 표시합니다. TradingView에서는 S&P500 및 다양한 종목의 실시간 차트를 확인할 수 있습니다.

Which ETF fits long-term holding or active trading?

QQQM is worth comparing first when the priority is long-term Nasdaq-100 exposure with the lower stated expense ratio. Frequent traders and options users should compare QQQ’s trading volume, bid-ask spread, and execution costs. A lower expense ratio does not guarantee the lowest total cost for every trading pattern.

Do the same benchmark and holdings mean identical returns?

Both products track the Nasdaq-100, so their major holdings and broad market direction overlap. Realized returns can still differ because of expenses, tracking, and distribution reinvestment timing. Similar historical movement does not guarantee future performance.

Official Invesco fund documents

Total expense ratios, inception dates, and benchmark details come from Invesco’s official product pages and fund materials. Fund terms can change, so investors should check the latest documents before buying.

Invesco QQQ Invesco QQQM

QQQ profile QQQM profile VOO vs SPY US stock fee calculator

QQQ vs QQQM questions

Do QQQ and QQQM track the same index?

Both ETFs track the Nasdaq-100. Their expense ratios, trading volume, and inception dates differ.

Which has the lower expense ratio, QQQ or QQQM?

QQQM has the lower official total expense ratio at 0.15%, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

Is QQQ always better for trading?

No. Actual trading cost depends on volume, bid-ask spreads, order size, and whether an investor uses options.

What does the long-term calculator include?

It applies each official expense ratio to the same principal, horizon, and assumed gross return. It excludes taxes, trading costs, and tracking differences.